Could AI Replace Mediators?

By John Sturrock KC
The original publication can be found at The Scotsman.

The founder of a site where AI models communicate with one another compared them to a “new species that is on planet Earth that is now smarter than us.”

These seemingly apocalyptic words, in a recent email from an American mediator colleague, certainly caused a stir among its recipients. A debate ensued about whether AI will usurp the function of mediators – as it threatens to do with many professional jobs in the near future.

It is interesting that many of these American mediators report the widespread use of AI by parties and lawyers participating in mediations.  Indeed, a number of those mediators are themselves using AI to summarise the mediation papers, structure possible negotiation approaches, help prepare “mediator proposals”, assess emotions and assist with strategies to overcome impasse. Some are even developing their own software programmes (or asking AI to do that for them).

Commenting on the use of AI in recruitment, a legal careers adviser recently observed that “law is fundamentally people-focused and technology should enhance rather than replace human judgment”.

With that in mind, I had intended to write about how mediators and lawyers can adapt to the advent of AI, on the assumption that the strengths we have, such as building relationships and trust over many years, cannot be displaced. And then I read an article by Matt Shumer, entitled ‘Something Big Is Happening’, and watched the first of mathematician Professor Hannah Fry’s BBC documentaries on the subject of AI. The enormity of what could be facing us hit me. Shumer describes it as “like the moment you realise the water has been rising around you and is now at your chest.”

According to Shumer, the AI models available today are unrecognisable from what existed even a few months ago. The most recent models make decisions that would have been unthinkable a year ago. They have something that “felt, for the first time, like judgment.” Chat GPT and Claude have released new models that make “everything before them feel like a different era.” AI is now building itself, with the ability to improve exponentially, not linearly. The people behind this technology are “simultaneously more excited and more frightened than anyone else on the planet”. One has said that AI models “substantially smarter than almost all humans at almost all tasks” are on track for 2026 or 2027. Shumer concludes that massive disruption could occur by the end of this year. We need to prepare, he says.

To those who argue we have been here before, it is said that this is different from every previous wave of automation. AI isn’t replacing one specific skill. It’s a general substitute for cognitive work. It gets better at everything simultaneously. We know that some law firms are making significant use of AI to do work that associates would once have carried out. One managing partner apparently expects AI be able to do most of what he does before long…

Shumer’s article has been dismissed as self-serving and way over the top. But questions remain. Will AI replicate deep human empathy? Replace the trust built over years of a relationship? We would hope not. But that some people have begun to rely on AI for emotional support, advice and companionship is illustrated in Hannah Fry’s startling documentary.

So, where might this lead, even for mediators, among whose key attributes is working with very complex human situations? I suspect that we don’t yet know – and that the biggest threat is complacency. We may be facing the biggest change any of us have experienced.

Author Biography

John Sturrock KC is the founder and senior mediator at Core Solutions. He is a pioneer of mediation throughout the UK and elsewhere with his work extending to the commercial, professional, sports, public sector, policy and political fields. He is a Distinguished Fellow Emeritus of the international Academy of Mediators and was also formerly a mediator with Brick Court Chambers in London. John also specialises in facilitation, negotiation and conflict management training and coaching for public sector leaders, civil servants, politicians, and sports and business leaders. He has worked with various parliamentary bodies throughout the UK on effective scrutiny of policy, and led a major review for the Scottish Government into allegations of bullying and harassment in the national health service in Scotland. He also founded Collaborative Scotland, a non-for-profit promoting nonpartisan respectful dialogue about difficult issues. John also has published two volumes of his book, A Mediator’s Musings (available on Amazon).

Connect with John via LinkedIn

The Art of the Prompt for Lawyers, Mediators, and Arbitrators

John Lande
This article has been republished with permission. The original publication can be located within Indisputably.

The quality of AI outputs depends on users’ skill in inputting good prompts.

That’s the premise of my new article: The Art of AI Prompting in Law and Dispute Resolution Practice.

It provides practical guidance about how to use AI tools responsibly, ethically, and effectively. It describes core skills including:

  • Choosing the right AI tool
  • Writing good prompts
  • Using follow-up questions
  • Avoiding AI’s problems
  • Applying professional judgment when using results

It’s important to choose the right AI tool. A brilliant prompt to the wrong tool is a bad prompt. The article includes a list of specialized legal AI tools for legal and dispute resolution practice.

You shouldn’t just take the first response – it’s important to ask follow-up questions. This article offers a long list of suggested follow-up prompts.

It also provides examples of prompts across the life of a case – before, during, and after mediation.

It cites ABA Ethics Opinion 512, which describes lawyers’ ethical duty of technological competence under the ABA Model Rules.

If you would like to see some hands-on demonstrations, I also posted two short SSRN articles with companion 30-minute videos:

AI won’t do your work for you. But it can help you do it better – and probably faster.

Take a look.

Getting Ahead of the Curve:  A Video for Mediators and Lawyers About AI

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly part of daily life in legal and mediation practice.  Mediators and lawyers (“practitioners”) may wonder how they can use it to provide good client service and remain competitive in the marketplace.  Indeed, some practitioners may wonder whether they’ll be able to do so in the future without using AI.

Recent data show that lawyers’ use of AI in the US is growing rapidly – and many practitioners will need to learn how to use it effectively to succeed in a changing market.  This post highlights a 30-minute video that introduces basic AI concepts and offers practical tips for mediators and lawyers.  It links to a short article explaining how practitioners can use AI to promote client decision-making, improve efficiency, and navigate common pitfalls.

Many Lawyers Are Using AI – and Probably More Will Soon

The 2024 American Bar Association (ABA) Formal Ethics Opinion 512 states that “lawyers should become aware of the [general artificial intelligence] tools relevant to their work so that they can make an informed decision, as a matter of professional judgment, whether to avail themselves of these tools or to conduct their work by other means.”  Indeed, “it is conceivable that lawyers will eventually have to use them to competently complete certain tasks for clients.” (Emphasis added.)

In the past two years, lawyers’ use of AI has grown substantially, and it is expected to keep growing.  According to the ABA’s 2024 Legal Technology Survey, about 30% of U.S. law firms now use AI tools, up from 11% in the previous year.  Another 15% said they were seriously considering using AI tools.  In firms with more than 100 attorneys, 46% currently use AI tools.

Almost half the lawyers in the survey believe that AI will become mainstream within three years.  If they’re right, by the time that today’s 1Ls graduate, they will need to learn how to use AI properly.  This includes knowing how to avoid mistakes – like filing hallucinated documents – and how to create value for clients and employers.  (Here’s a link to a post with a video and article for faculty and students.)

I haven’t found data on mediators’ use of AI, but those who work with lawyers will increasingly encounter it.  Mediators can also find many valuable ways to use it in their own activities.

Academic and Practitioner Perspectives About AI

Academics and practitioners often approach AI from different perspectives.  Academics work in institutions that reward deliberation over rapid adoption of innovations.  Faculty generally experience little immediate pressure to change their practices, and they don’t (yet) face professional risks or lost opportunities if they ignore AI.  Indeed, many are pressed for time as it is, so they may have little incentive to add to their immediate workload – even though AI can enable them to work more efficiently over the long term.  Some approach AI skeptically, raising important critiques of its societal effects, such as environmental harms, de-skilling, and labor displacement.

By contrast, practitioners generally work in a market expecting them to provide professional services efficiently.  For them, AI is less a policy debate than a practical tool.  Even if they are concerned about societal risks, they may still use it because they face pressure to keep up – and have little leeway to wait.  Practitioners may not view AI as entirely good or bad and – thinking like mediators – they may recognize complex tradeoffs that shift with evolving technology and human adaptation.

Given today’s legal and dispute resolution market, many practitioners need to learn how to use AI effectively and responsibly.

Getting Started Using AI

This 30-minute video offers a basic introduction about how you can use AI tools such as ChatGPT.  It provides pointers on how you can write good prompts and avoid common mistakes.  The video includes two demonstrations using RPS Coach, a specialized AI tool for negotiation and mediation.  This 4-page article provides links to the PowerPoint slides and a transcript of the AI demonstrations.

The video and article are designed for mediators and lawyers who want to use AI to improve their work, help clients, save time, and stay competitive in a world where AI is rapidly becoming the norm.

It makes sense to start using AI gradually rather than wait until it becomes expected or unavoidable.  Building skills over time can help you gain confidence and develop sound judgment without the pressure of having to master everything at once – especially if it becomes essential in your work.